这里只有精品免费,欧美图片一区二区三区,视频精品二区

本文目錄一覽

1，英語(yǔ)辯論賽的辯論詞
2，英語(yǔ)辯論賽which should receive priority in China environment

1，英語(yǔ)辯論賽的辯論詞

hello 我是小謝繡姐你好給我分吧

英語(yǔ)辯論賽的辯論詞

2，英語(yǔ)辯論賽which should receive priority in China environment

當(dāng)然是可持續(xù)發(fā)展，發(fā)展的同時(shí)考慮環(huán)境保護(hù)。辯論分為兩面，可以選擇生活中常見(jiàn)的依據(jù)就可以。重在英語(yǔ)表達(dá)。

正方陳詞：good morning everyone! we are here now debating about whether environment protection or economy growth should take priority in china we think its environment growth should be chosen. i have three reasons to prove this point. first as a developing country the economy power is far behind the developed counties china have one fifth of the people in the world but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries. so the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy. second economy growth doesnt necessarily conflict with environment protection. we can develop our economy without environment pollution .third when our economy strength become strong we can spend more money and energy on environment protectiontill then it will be a win-win. in a word considering the current situations economy growth should take priority in china. 反方陳詞：we agree econonmic growth is needed.but think about the past decadeswe followed the old model of “first pollutionlast treament” however how did it come out? the environment problems have become increasingly prominent and some local regions environment have been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.whats more the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much by this means it placed us in a completely passive position. at the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life urban conservation and the environment.sowe must get to the bottom of the problem and learne from the past that is to say in the course of development we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority. only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably. thats all i want to say. 自由辯論正方：we all know that in many places of china like many poor contrieswhere the environment is pretty goodthere are thousands people 徘徊在貧困線(xiàn)上，lack of maoneyfor the food the need to live.then opponent debatersdo you think we still need to develop our economics? 反方：but opponent debaters cant ignore a fact that most areas of china have solved the problem of food and clothing at present.we have had the ability to help them.on the contrary the level of economic development in many cities in eastern china is very high .but the pollution is pretty serious accordingly. the overcrowded living areas the foul air the impure water the unbearable noise and rush hour traffic all these things have affected the quality of life. we have money but being under the sub health condition.does it make any sense opponent debaters? 正方：there do exist some estern cities whose economy is quite developed but you forget that china has 130 billion people. and in most place the economy is quite backward the estern cities cant support all need of chinese people. we know that environment protection need high-technology high-tech personnel and science research. they all need a lot of moneyand money is created by economy. i want ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strenth? 反方：environmental protection needs economy . but we cant sacrifice the environment for the economic growth . if you drink polluted water eat the toxic food can we have a high quality of life ? economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection . the policy of “returning farmland to forests and grass” slow down the speed of economic development to protect the environment. doses it show that the environmental protection is more important? 正方：opponent debaters have refered the returning farmland to forest policy.we admit our country has pay a lot of money for the environment even sacrificing the profit .but we hold the idea that the ep is an appro.. to ensure our economic develop better. as for the incident why we give up the money 。。。。。正方總杰 反方總結(jié): our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy” .the goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future . if the economic growth lead to the pollution of the environment can we live a better life ? the excessive economic growth has caused the greenhouse effect which lead to sea-level rises . as a result thousands of coastal dweller have to face the fate of the migration . moreoverthe opponent also said ” when our economy strength become strong we can spend more money and energy on environment protection.” i want to question that when the animals and plants have died out what the opponent debater protect with the money and energy . if the economic growth delays for two years we can wait two years to develop it .but if the environmental protection delays two years the species will be extinct the resources will exhaust . the urgency like this cant wait . so our side advocate the environmental protection should receive priority in china.thank you.

英語(yǔ)辯論賽which should receive priority in China environment